Sunday, January 18, 2009

Sophocles, Truth Seeking, and Knowledge

In his Oedipus the King, Sophocles sends a strange message about the power of knowledge. The Theban society both rewards and punishes knowledge. Knowledge and wisdom are what allow Oedipus to answer the riddle of the Sphinx and consequently attain greatness in Thebes. Regardless of his tragic methods, Oedipus pursues knowledge of Laios’s death even against Teiresias’s advice. Indeed, his dogged pursuit of the truth leads to his downfall. Oedipus was revered for his intelligence and just rule, but his pursuit of additional knowledge was deemed inappropriate by the gods. Thus, Sophocles appears to suggest that there is a limit to what Oedipus – or any man – should know. Perhaps Oedipus’s brash invective against Teiresias and Creon was rooted in a desire to understand something that humans were not meant to comprehend. If that is true, then Oedipus’s flaw is less of ruling unjustly (without any facts to support his accusations) than it is of hubris. Oedipus thinks he knows better than Teiresias – a messenger of the gods – and is entitled to the seer’s knowledge of Laios’s murder.

However, following the definition of a tragic mistake, that would mean that Oedipus would not have reached his terrible downfall if he had not blindly lashed out at Teiresias and Creon. Iocaste seems to support that hypothesis when she begs Oedipus not to continue searching for the truth of Laios’s death. It is understood that Oedipus should have respected Teiresias’s decision to withhold information. If Oedipus had not sought the truth of his father’s death, he would still have unwittingly fulfilled the initial prophecy of killing his father and marrying his mother, but he would never have suffered the disgrace of finding out. He would not have been forced to confront his incestuous relationship and would not have shamed his family. Teiresias would never have had occasion to predict Oedipus’s humbling fall to become a “blind man / who has his eyes now; a penniless man, who is rich now / and he will go tapping the strange earth with his staff…” In short, Oedipus would never have been fated to disgrace and therefore, he would never have fulfilled that prophecy.

Oedipus was loved in Thebes and could probably have remained a popular and effective leader if he had not allowed his pride to cloud his judgment. However, even with his sight, Oedipus was not able to see what lay right in front of him. He sought a truth denied to him and it cost him his sight, his honor, and his family.

7 comments:

Ben Murphy said...

You raise a very interesting and valid point about Sophocles's depiction of the limits placed on knowledge and the impact of the breaching of those limits by hubris. Your analysis of Oedipus's downfall can be applied to today, for the personal consequence of such a transgression is as visible in our modern lives as it is in Oedipus Rex.

Kendra Simon said...

Wow Mark! I absolutely love this blog. I was actually thinking about this very dilemma in class on Friday but I did not know how to articulate it. I think your examination of truth and knowledge in Oedipus Rex is very fascinating. It is intersting to think of how the story would have ended if Oedipus had not doggedly sought the truth. Again, great job with this blog.

Janey Zitomer said...

Mark,
I really enjoyed reading your blog and I think the topic you chose was very interesting. I had not given much thought into how Oedipus uses knowledge to his advantage, and how that knowledge simultaneously leads to his demise and your blog gave very good insight into the subject. I thought you did a great job of clearly stating your point. Well done!

John Greenberg said...

Mark, this was a very nice blog post. I liked your theory about the limits of knowledge placed by the Gods and how Oedipus’s desire to pass this knowledge barrier and his hubris ultimately caused his downfall. You provide multiple examples to support your point, such as Oedipus’s failure to respect Teiresias’s decision. I enjoyed reading your blog and thought that you did an excellent job.

Devin Ingersoll said...

I hadn't really thought about the limits of knowledge presented in Oedipus before and I think you did an excellent job of analyzing it. I specifically enjoy the way in which you write because of the perfect word choices you make. Your sentences are so full of meaning without using words as just fluff.

Sophie C-K said...

Mark,

What an interesting blog! Your thoughtful comments are always worth noting. I think that Oedipus's quest to pursue knowledge beyond the limits of man's ability is very applicable to modern day life, especially with the glut of knowledge available on television, in newspapers, and on the internet. There are just some things that you never need to know. Again, your blog was obviously well-considered and certainly added to my ideas about the play.

LCC said...

It may be that respecting Teiresias's desire not to speak is what Oedipus SHOULD have done, but it's also the very nature of tragedy that that is the one thing he COULD NOT do.